You are here
About Our Reporting Standards
Reporting standards are intended to provide uniformity of definitions and classifications for comparative purposes. They are instructive on how to report information from clinical studies in a consistent manner to make it easy for the reader to compare results. The literature is reviewed for evidence supported items before developing definitions, classifications, and scorings. In the absence of such evidence, a writing group comprised of experts on the topic may develop through consensus definitions, classifications, and scorings.
SVS members are invited to propose reporting standard topics, using this request form.
Current Reporting Standards and Implementation Tools
|Reporting Standard||Executive Summary||Implementation Tools|
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):e23–e35.
|Executive summary||Data Collection Sheet for NTOS: First Visit|
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):e1–e21.
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):776–786.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jun;53(6):1679–1695.
J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):1048–1060.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1022–1033.e5.
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):603–610.
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Sep;26(3):517–538.
Reporting Standards in Development
- Endovascular aortic repair of aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries
- Type-B aortic dissection