You are here
Obese patients have more post-op trouble after open AAA repair
OUTCOMES AFTER ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM REPAIR IN OBESE VERSUS NON-OBESE PATIENTS. Journal of Vascular Surgery, December 2018
CHICAGO, Illinois, December 2018 – New research in the December edition of the Journal of Vascular Surgery suggests significant increase in morbidities in obese patients after open surgery, but not after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
Researchers found that obese patients were more likely to have longer procedures and to lose more blood than those who were not obese, and obese patients were more likely to have post-operative problems such as renal failure or wound infections.
In this new study, researchers from Johns Hopkins University, led by vascular surgeon Dr. Mahmoud Malas, performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data by the Vascular Quality Initiative (2003-2017) with the aim of comparing in-hospital outcomes in obese (body mass index >30) vs non-obese patients undergoing AAA repair.
“In this large national sample of an elective AAA cohort,” said Dr. Malas, “obese patients had similar in-hospital mortality compared with non-obese patients in both open and endovascular repairs. The results remained unchanged even after looking at different subclasses of obesity, including those with BMI >40.”
Previous work defining early outcomes after AAA in the obese has yielded conflicted results. Recent meta-analysis suggested the superiority of endovascular repair over open, but only four studies with relatively small numbers were included. Single center studies have either corroborated this conclusion or failed to demonstrate a difference.
Their study ultimately evaluated 33,082 procedures including
• Open repair (non-obese, n=4,604, obese, n=1,754)
• Endovascular repair (non-obese, n=18,338, obese, n=8,385)
Demographic analysis revealed that the obese patients, compared to the non-obese, were • Younger (67.6 vs 70.3 years old)
• Male (open repair, 76% vs 73%, endovascular repair, 82% vs 81%)
• More likely to have significant comorbid conditions (diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart disease)
Evaluation of the operations revealed that the obese had
• Higher blood loss (open, 2,030 vs 1,617ml, endovascular 228 vs 207ml)
• Longer operations (open 259 vs 239 mins, endovascular 138 vs 134 mins)
With regards to outcomes, there was no difference in mortality between the groups for either repair method (open 3% vs 3%, endovascular 0.5% vs 0.6%).
However, following open repair, the obese patients had higher odds of developing:
• Renal failure (1.33 odds ratio)
• Wound infection (1.75 odds ratio)
“Wound infection is a common complication seen among obese patients undergoing all surgical procedures. Even after adjusting for comorbid conditions, the obese had 75% higher odds of wound infection following open repair, with the highest rates observed in the more severely obese patients,” notes Dr. Malas.
“In this study open repair showed increased risk of all in-hospital complications compared with endovascular therapy for AAA,” Dr. Malas said, “corroborating the known superiority of endovascular repair over open repair seen in the literature.”
While weight reduction itself would be considered important, this is not always possible in cases where more urgent care is necessary, such as AAA. With the prevalence of significant obesity in the United States as high as 39.8%, understanding its impact on the outcomes of various medical procedures is key in delivering safe and cost-effective health care.
This research article is open source through Jan. 31, 2019 at http://vsweb.org/JVS-Obesity.