New study provides more support for minimally invasive treatments for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence

Researchers compared three techniques in the treatment of varicose pathology: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high ligation and stripping (HLS) and conservative hemodynamic correction of venous insufficiency (CHIVA) to determine superior intervention

ROSEMONT, Ill., Jan. 25, 2021 – A large prospective, single-center, randomized trial from Spain comparing two open surgical techniques with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat saphenous incompetence found RFA comparable to both invasive approaches in terms of clinical recurrence and quality of life at two years. The study results appear in the January 2021 edition of the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders.

While saphenous incompetence historically has been treated with high ligation and stripping (HLS) of the saphenous vein, less invasive surgical techniques, such as saphenous vein preservation, ultrasound guided conservative hemodynamic correction of venous insufficiency (CHIVA) and RFA, have been introduced over the past decades. 

According to lead author Elena Gonzalez Canas, MD, PhD, from Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari Sabadell in Barcelona, “Up to 70% of varicose veins result from great saphenous vein incompetence, and GSV incompetence can lead to other unpleasant symptoms that should be monitored and potentially treated by a health care professional.”

In designing their study, Dr. Canas states, “Our aim was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation using a non-inferior study compared to stripping and CHIVA.”

Researchers compared the three techniques in 225 limbs with primary varicose veins due to GSV incompetence.

The clinical recurrence rate at 24 months for the three techniques was:

  • RFA (n=74)                       7%         (five patients)
  • HLS (n=75)                        4%         (three patients)
  • CHIVA (n=76)                   15%       (11 patients)

Statistical analysis revealed RFA was non-inferior to both surgical techniques for clinical recurrence.

Duplex ultrasound recurrence at 24 months for the three techniques was:

  • RFA                                    13%       (ten patients)
  • HLS                                    7%         (five patients)
  • CHIVA                                47%       (36 patients)

Statistical analysis did not reveal RFA to be non-inferior to HLS for ultrasound recurrence.

No differences were found among the three groups when assessing the clinical response according to the Venous Clinical Severity Score at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Additionally, significant improvement in quality of life was documented for all three groups.

“The trial results support the increasing use of RFA to treat lower extremity varicose veins due to saphenous incompetence, not only for its safety, but also efficacy at 24 months,” said Dr. Canas. “There have been significant advances in treatments available to vascular surgeons, and this trial furthers our knowledge and understanding as to the best treatments for this common disease entity.”

To download the full article, visit: